|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A blog about research, awareness, prevention, treatment and survivorship of Breast Cancer and all cancers, including targeted scientific research and a grassroots approach to increase screening for cancer, especially in the low income and under-insured population of El Paso, Texas, with a view to expand this new health care model to many other 'minority' populations across the United States and beyond
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
FDA APPROVED POMALIDOMIDE
MUTATION IN "p" IN A CHROMOSOME IS GOOD FOR YOU!
To further confirm that "p" is better that "q", I went back to see what is the mutation in a curable cancer and germ cell tumors or testicular cancer. And guess what? It is not 12q that is abnormal in testicular cancer, IT IS INDEED 12p that is involved in the Malignant transformation.
CCND2 is at 12p13, but also SOX5, JAW1, and KRAS is at 12p11.2-12.1
You know angry corresponding family members are located on other chromosomes, but not amplified in Testicular cancer and would confer resistance to therapy. In fact it would be interesting to see if they are amplified in refractory cases for proof of concept!
The association with endoreduplication (Multiple ploidies) is another good thing to look into further as it relates (or not) to 12p Mutation!
Certainly the response to chemotherapy alone is an intriguing phenomena by itself and should open up cues to look for in other cancers! I believe it is in the "p" and in the "ploidy" thing or tendency to multiply that is where the cancer vulnerability is squarely located!
CCND2 is at 12p13, but also SOX5, JAW1, and KRAS is at 12p11.2-12.1
You know angry corresponding family members are located on other chromosomes, but not amplified in Testicular cancer and would confer resistance to therapy. In fact it would be interesting to see if they are amplified in refractory cases for proof of concept!
The association with endoreduplication (Multiple ploidies) is another good thing to look into further as it relates (or not) to 12p Mutation!
Certainly the response to chemotherapy alone is an intriguing phenomena by itself and should open up cues to look for in other cancers! I believe it is in the "p" and in the "ploidy" thing or tendency to multiply that is where the cancer vulnerability is squarely located!
Cellular Variations/language *New German study finds Kras stimulation in Pancreatic cancer is not the same as Kras stimulation in the lung and therefore PI3K expression will not have same implications
Selective Requirement of PI3K/PDK1 Signaling for Kras Oncogene-Driven Pancreatic Cell Plasticity and Cancer
Stefan Eser, Nina Reiff, et al.
Read it. It tells you that not only the implications of a stimulation of one molecule change with the tissue because of tissue specific genetic silencing , but also changes can occur on different RAS family member (NRas or Hras) leading to different meaning in terms of consequence for the cell.
Another discrimination level is that many types of stimulation can induce the same pathway. C-JUN can be induced by radiation, chemical, hypoxia or infection. Any thing that is considered stressful, including lack of extracellular stimulation. This last point is very important in the Central nervous system where pre-synaptic stimulation is critical for post synaptic neurons. Lack of stimulation induces an inflammatory process in both the neuron and the glial cell. In the glial cell, the myelin sheath is scarily attacked or no longer formed.
The duplicity phenomena occurs particularly at the cellular membrane where many receptors would be stimulated by several stimulants and vice versa (many stimulants for same receptor). Only the cell and its tissue type know what to give out!
*New study concurs that mammogram should be done every 2 years and after 50 years of age. That only those women with dense breasts should start at 40 years of age and annually. The controversy dance is fueled once again and I don't blame anyone! We have seen cases of course which did not fit these prescription. Why change things that work.
Stefan Eser, Nina Reiff, et al.
Read it. It tells you that not only the implications of a stimulation of one molecule change with the tissue because of tissue specific genetic silencing , but also changes can occur on different RAS family member (NRas or Hras) leading to different meaning in terms of consequence for the cell.
Another discrimination level is that many types of stimulation can induce the same pathway. C-JUN can be induced by radiation, chemical, hypoxia or infection. Any thing that is considered stressful, including lack of extracellular stimulation. This last point is very important in the Central nervous system where pre-synaptic stimulation is critical for post synaptic neurons. Lack of stimulation induces an inflammatory process in both the neuron and the glial cell. In the glial cell, the myelin sheath is scarily attacked or no longer formed.
The duplicity phenomena occurs particularly at the cellular membrane where many receptors would be stimulated by several stimulants and vice versa (many stimulants for same receptor). Only the cell and its tissue type know what to give out!
*New study concurs that mammogram should be done every 2 years and after 50 years of age. That only those women with dense breasts should start at 40 years of age and annually. The controversy dance is fueled once again and I don't blame anyone! We have seen cases of course which did not fit these prescription. Why change things that work.
Sunday, March 17, 2013
PANCREATIC CANCER GENE (CONTINUED)
1' KRT20: keratin related gene, most likely of an early expression in neoplastic transformation
more predictive and diagnostic than of less therapeutic potential.
2-TEM 7: The blood vessels of Tumors seems to have an exclusive marker called Tumor Endothelial Marker or TEM. Target therapy directed at this stuff may lead tumor to anoxic death by closing these vessels, at least that the wish of researchers, will follow their efforts!
Certainly this used as serologic marker or radiologically, can locate metastatic lesions.
3-MAP2K4" direct activator of the MAPK/c-JUNK through MAP8& 14. (Not the standard MAPK1)
but it also interact with an anchor called Filamin Though FLNC, filamin is actin binding protein, raising the issue of whether or not it is using this tract to quickly influence the Nucleus or whether it allows it to phosphorylate things right there! we know its expression is, like the MTOR stimulated path, preserving survival! Does this open the door to MTOR Inhibitor in Pancreatic cancer? Does expression of this pathway, an opportunity to introduce MTOR inhibitors?
4-BAT-26
please read this:
"BAT-26, an indicator of the replication error phenotype in colorectal cancers and cell lines" by
9-ERBB2
10-GAS
11-TM4SF5
more predictive and diagnostic than of less therapeutic potential.
2-TEM 7: The blood vessels of Tumors seems to have an exclusive marker called Tumor Endothelial Marker or TEM. Target therapy directed at this stuff may lead tumor to anoxic death by closing these vessels, at least that the wish of researchers, will follow their efforts!
Certainly this used as serologic marker or radiologically, can locate metastatic lesions.
3-MAP2K4" direct activator of the MAPK/c-JUNK through MAP8& 14. (Not the standard MAPK1)
but it also interact with an anchor called Filamin Though FLNC, filamin is actin binding protein, raising the issue of whether or not it is using this tract to quickly influence the Nucleus or whether it allows it to phosphorylate things right there! we know its expression is, like the MTOR stimulated path, preserving survival! Does this open the door to MTOR Inhibitor in Pancreatic cancer? Does expression of this pathway, an opportunity to introduce MTOR inhibitors?
4-BAT-26
please read this:
"BAT-26, an indicator of the replication error phenotype in colorectal cancers and cell lines" by
BAT 26 IS THEREFORE AN INDICATOR OF MICRO-SATELLITE INSTABILITY STATUS IN CANCER.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-ALOX12
6-TP53
7-BIRC5
8-NME19-ERBB2
10-GAS
11-TM4SF5
An interesting set of Circumstances
------------------------------------
We seem to live an interesting time, unusual things happening, the government is late doing stuff. Although it claims it is pro-business, licenses are delayed and the emphasis seems to crack down, and pay less. Shrinking everything seems to be the impetus!
The most interesting scenario is what is happening with the IRS. Because I need to meet some money demands, I filed my taxes early in February or as soon as I got my W-2 and related 1099. 4 weeks after I filed, I got a text on my phone that the IRS has rejected my filing. I thought it was a joke but sure enough I got confirmation through my e-mail and from the IRS office. We must live an interesting revolution! When the IRS is now evading tax-filing. It used to be that if you do something incorrect, the IRS corrects it. I had come to expect that and normally sent my best evaluation for their smart correction. NOW if they are rejecting Tax submission where the hell should I go? The interesting thing is, according to their not, a rejected Tax file is not a "Filing, and the can still charge me for late filing and evasion if not refiled". Can you possibly evade Taxes when you are repeatedly trying to file? The IRS is getting it both ways I believe. They refuse to do the work, and still threaten to punish me! What in the world is going on? If you figure it out, help me!
------------------------------------
We seem to live an interesting time, unusual things happening, the government is late doing stuff. Although it claims it is pro-business, licenses are delayed and the emphasis seems to crack down, and pay less. Shrinking everything seems to be the impetus!
The most interesting scenario is what is happening with the IRS. Because I need to meet some money demands, I filed my taxes early in February or as soon as I got my W-2 and related 1099. 4 weeks after I filed, I got a text on my phone that the IRS has rejected my filing. I thought it was a joke but sure enough I got confirmation through my e-mail and from the IRS office. We must live an interesting revolution! When the IRS is now evading tax-filing. It used to be that if you do something incorrect, the IRS corrects it. I had come to expect that and normally sent my best evaluation for their smart correction. NOW if they are rejecting Tax submission where the hell should I go? The interesting thing is, according to their not, a rejected Tax file is not a "Filing, and the can still charge me for late filing and evasion if not refiled". Can you possibly evade Taxes when you are repeatedly trying to file? The IRS is getting it both ways I believe. They refuse to do the work, and still threaten to punish me! What in the world is going on? If you figure it out, help me!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)